In the corporate sphere , there are events of professional negligence that are overlooked, and then there are stories that put a spotlight on moral failures. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, falls squarely in the latter category — a story of suspected unethical behavior that deeply harms the reputation of a lone supervisor but casts a shadow over the enterprise’s integrity.
Despite serious allegations , Collins has kept his position , visibly unaffected by the uproar swirling around him . How has this been allowed to persist ? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of questionable behavior started with violations of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t cease there. Instead, it escalated into a series of ethical breaches that has left team members disenchanted and customers perplexed.
Throughout a leadership improvement workshop— ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities —David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a professional opportunity into a chain of irresponsible incidents . Insiders suggest he spent business-funded trips engaging in flirtatious behavior , a clear breach of Ventia’s shared values , all while his family remained uninformed .
But the impropriety didn’t end with romantic pursuits . One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged abuse of company Ventia New Zealand IT systems to distribute inappropriate images to additional info women—a clear misuse of professional tools and a destruction of integrity. His bold misuse of Microsoft Teams to distribute risqué communications—including emojis to brag about extramarital affairs — creates a portrait Ventia Expose of a man apathetic to the fallout. Following these digital advances , Collins allegedly intensified his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on repeated times during working hours, despite his own marital status and her having a partner . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but tore apart homes— leaving a path of mistrust that extended outside of the office .
In what way can this behavior be permitted to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly overstepped every rule is still in a position of power at Ventia? The response , it appears, originates in a troubling lack of oversight within the company . Complaints have been made , yet Collins operates without restraint .
This absence of retribution sends a dangerous message : that rank and influence within the organization can shield someone from repercussions . It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , discourages team members, and ultimately harms the company’s standing .